Entity: U.S. federal courts
📊 Facts Database / Entities / U.S. federal courts

U.S. federal courts

7 Facts
4 Related Topics
In U.S. federal criminal practice, an indictment typically marks the start of a protracted court process that can include pretrial motions, discovery, and a potential trial.
October 08, 2025 high procedural
Describes the general role of an indictment within the U.S. federal criminal justice process.
Defense attorneys in U.S. federal cases commonly file pretrial motions to dismiss indictments, sometimes arguing grounds such as selective prosecution or vindictive prosecution.
October 08, 2025 high procedural
General defense strategy available in federal criminal proceedings.
Many U.S. federal courts use random assignment to allocate judges to cases as a means of promoting impartiality.
October 08, 2025 high procedural
Describes a common case-assignment procedure in federal courts.
Indictments in U.S. federal cases sometimes do not identify confidential associates or anonymous sources, which can complicate external assessment of the strength and specifics of the alleged evidence.
October 08, 2025 high procedural
Explains how omissions in indictments about sources can affect public understanding of allegations.
U.S. federal courts assessing constitutional challenges to election regulations require plaintiffs to allege individualized harm (injury) to establish standing.
October 08, 2025 high legal
Legal standard for Article III standing in election-related lawsuits
U.S. federal courts can issue temporary injunctions that block presidential orders or federal troop deployments when a court finds the president likely exceeded legal authority.
October 05, 2025 high legal
Federal courts have authority to enjoin executive actions pending legal review when those actions are plausibly beyond presidential authority.
U.S. federal courts can issue temporary restraining orders blocking federal deployment or federalization of state National Guard forces if the courts determine there is insufficient justification and that deployment could harm state sovereignty.
October 04, 2025 high legal
Describes judicial authority to enjoin federal actions involving state National Guard on sovereignty and justification grounds.