Comey arraigned in EDVA case; pleads not guilty before Judge Nachmanoff
James Comey was arraigned in federal court in Alexandria, Va., before U.S. District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff and pleaded not guilty to a two‑count indictment alleging he made a materially false statement to Congress and obstructed a Senate Judiciary Committee proceeding arising from his Sept. 30, 2020 testimony. The indictment, returned as a five‑year statute‑of‑limitations deadline approached, was filed after a rapid personnel change installing Acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan over career prosecutors who reportedly advised against charging, drawing sharp political reactions while Comey publicly denied the allegations.
📌 Key Facts
- A Northern Virginia grand jury returned a two‑count federal indictment charging former FBI Director James Comey with making a materially false statement to Congress and obstructing a congressional proceeding based on his Sept. 30, 2020 Senate testimony about whether he authorized an anonymous FBI source; a proposed third count failed to receive a majority.
- The indictment was filed in late September 2025 in the Eastern District of Virginia after Acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan—installed after U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert resigned—signed and presented the case to the grand jury.
- Career prosecutors in the EDVA reportedly recommended against charging Comey and documented internal concerns; grand‑jury voting was 14 of 23 for the two counts, and multiple reports say prosecutors moved quickly to seek an indictment before a looming five‑year statute‑of‑limitations deadline tied to the 2020 testimony.
- Comey surrendered for arraignment in Alexandria, Va., on Oct. 8, 2025, pleaded not guilty before U.S. District Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff, was released with no conditions, and the court set a trial date of January 5, 2026.
- Comey posted a public video denying the charges—saying 'I'm innocent' and 'I'm not afraid'—and is represented in the case by defense attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald.
- The prosecution and its timing prompted intense political reaction: President Trump celebrated the indictment and urged further prosecutions of opponents, while Democrats and legal experts warned the president’s public attacks could be used by the defense to argue vindictive or politically motivated prosecution.
- Court filings showed docket inconsistencies (two‑count versus three‑count versions) that drew a magistrate’s scrutiny, and watchdog groups have sought a Department of Justice inspector‑general review of the decision to prosecute.
- Media reporting said the FBI considered staging a public 'perp walk' for Comey, provoking internal resistance and the suspension of at least one agent; DOJ and FBI officials later publicly dismissed those reports as 'gossip' and said the agency is not about 'theater.'
📊 Analysis & Commentary (2)
"A Politico Playbook analysis argues the Comey indictment is a watershed example of the Trump administration's widening retribution campaign — using DOJ power to target political foes — and warns it threatens DOJ independence and the rule of law while deepening partisan divides."
"The Politico Playbook piece critiques the indictment and arraignment of James Comey as a politically driven, norm‑shattering prosecution—fueled by White House personnel moves in the Eastern District of Virginia—even as it recognizes the formal legal processes (grand jury, arraignment) are underway."
📰 Sources (43)
- Watchdog letter seeks DOJ IG review of the decision to prosecute Comey, asserting the case was brought to satisfy a presidential vendetta.
- Letter cites the timing of the indictment near the statute-of-limitations deadline as part of its concern.
- James Comey appeared for his first court proceeding (arraignment) and pleaded not guilty.
- CBS frames the charges as stemming from congressional testimony five years ago (2020) and notes DOJ filed the case in late September.
- James Comey was arraigned on Wednesday and pleaded not guilty.
- Charges were brought by EDVA U.S. Attorney Lindsay Halligan, whom PBS notes replaced a predecessor ousted after refusing to charge Comey.
- The indictment alleges Comey lied to Congress five years ago.
- Presiding judge identified as U.S. District Judge Michael Nachmanoff (age 57).
- Nachmanoff's background: former Eastern District of Virginia top federal public defender, served six years as a magistrate judge, nominated to the bench by President Joe Biden in 2021.
- Notable prior actions: argued and won a Supreme Court case reducing racial disparities in crack sentencing; oversaw first appearances of Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman in 2019; refused to block the CIA from firing Dr. Terry Adirim.
- Contemporaneous reactions: lawyers quoted (Nina Ginsberg, Timothy Belevetz) praising his preparation, temperament and impartiality; President Trump publicly criticized the judge on social media.
- Arraignment occurred in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, on Oct. 8, 2025.
- U.S. District judge set a trial date of January 5, 2026.
- Comey was ordered released with no conditions.
- Defense lawyer Pat Fitzgerald publicly said he would represent Comey and was quoted at the courthouse.
- Article reports that Acting U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan has brought in prosecutors from North Carolina to assist (context on prosecutorial team staffing).
- James Comey formally pleaded not guilty to two federal counts in federal court.
- The plea was entered on Wednesday following an indictment by the Justice Department in September.
- CBS News published video coverage of the court appearance (reporters Scott MacFarlane and Caroline Polisi).
- Arraignment coverage dated Oct. 8, 2025 with Comey arriving in court and expected to plead not guilty.
- Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff noted as the randomly assigned judge, with background that he was nominated by President Biden and is a former chief federal defender; President Trump publicly derided the judge.
- Details about family presence: Comey family members attended, including daughter Maurene (reported to have been fired earlier this year from a DOJ prosecutor position) and son‑in‑law Troy Edwards Jr., who resigned his prosecutor job minutes after the indictment.
- Restatement that the indictment alleges Comey denied authorizing an associate to serve as an anonymous media source and obstructing a congressional proceeding; article reiterates timeline in which Lindsey Halligan replaced the prior U.S. attorney and filed charges before a statute‑of‑limitations deadline.
- Documentation of President Trump’s recent social-media posts that explicitly prejudged Comey’s guilt (including a quoted post: 'Whether you like Corrupt James Comey or not... HE LIED!') and explanation that those public statements could bolster a vindictive-prosecution defense.
- Analysis by NYT legal reporters that defense lawyers may use the president’s repeated public attacks as the basis to argue improper political pressure on DOJ (a potential avenue to seek dismissal or other relief).
- Live account confirming Comey is set to be arraigned Wednesday morning in federal court in Alexandria, Va., where Judge Michael S. Nachmanoff will hear the charges and request a plea.
- Context that the prosecutor who handled the case, Lindsey Halligan, was hastily installed as U.S. attorney after her predecessor found insufficient evidence to indict.
- Quotations and citation of President Trump’s recent social‑media posts asserting Comey 'lied,' underscoring potential grounds for a vindictive‑prosecution defense argument.
- Reporting emphasis that many current and former prosecutors view the case as difficult to prove, noting the unusual political backdrop to the prosecution.
- The indictment specifically alleges Comey told a senator on Sept. 30, 2020 that he had not 'authorized someone else at the F.B.I. to be an anonymous source in news reports' when, the indictment claims, he had authorized such a source.
- The article characterizes the indictment as 'extremely sparse' and notes the obstruction count as vague — asserting 'false and misleading statements' without elaborating details.
- Confirms the indictment was obtained by Lindsey Halligan, a recently installed acting U.S. attorney whose appointment followed resistance from career prosecutors.
- Notes the statutory‑limitations context (the Sept. 30, 2020 testimony timeframe) and that a proposed third charge was rejected by the grand jury.
- Comey is indicted on two felony charges: making a false statement to Congress (five years prior) and obstructing a congressional investigation.
- The indictment is described in reporting as two pages long.
- In court, Comey is expected to formally enter a not guilty plea at his arraignment.
- Arraignment logistics: Comey was ordered to report to the Alexandria (Eastern District of Virginia) courthouse at 10 a.m.; Judge Michael Nachmanoff will likely inform Comey of charges and take a plea.
- Prosecutorial staffing: Two assistant U.S. attorneys added to the case Tuesday — Gabriel Diaz and Nathaniel Lemons (from the Eastern District of North Carolina).
- Prosecutor background and role: Lindsey Halligan personally signed the indictment, was sworn in as acting U.S. attorney days before the indictment, and has handled parts of the prosecution.
- Defense and process notes: Defense counsel Patrick Fitzgerald is representing Comey; the article outlines likely procedural steps (release on recognizance, possible booking, fingerprinting) and speculates on potential motions (e.g., dismissal arguments about vindictive prosecution or Halligan’s appointment).
- Jury‑pool note: The piece cites recent voting patterns for the Alexandria division (62.6% voted for Democrat Kamala Harris vs. 34.1% for Trump) as context for potential jury composition.
- Federal judge Michael Nachmanoff has been randomly assigned to preside over the DOJ prosecution of former FBI director James Comey (assignment reported Oct. 8, 2025).
- Nachmanoff is a 57-year-old Biden appointee (confirmed 2021), former federal public defender and magistrate judge who won a Supreme Court case on crack‑cocaine sentencing disparities.
- Article cites specific past rulings and appearances he handled (e.g., first appearances of Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman in 2019; refused to block CIA firing of Dr. Terry Adirim).
- Political reactions are noted: President Trump publicly criticized the assignment; defense attorneys quoted praise Nachmanoff’s impartiality.
- Confirms Comey is expected to appear in federal court and to plead not guilty at the arraignment.
- Recaps indictment specifics: alleges Comey denied authorizing an associate to serve as an anonymous source to the media during his Sept. 30, 2020 testimony and charges obstruction of a congressional proceeding.
- Provides context on DOJ staffing/prosecutorial changes: notes Lindsey Halligan replaced the prior lead prosecutor and that charges were filed under a rushed timeline amid internal warnings.
- Notes the judge assigned (Michael Nachmanoff) is a Biden appointee and records President Trump’s critical reaction to that assignment.
- Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and FBI Director Kash Patel publicly and directly dismissed media reports of a planned 'perp walk' for James Comey during an on‑camera Fox News Digital interview at the FBI's Chicago field office.
- Blanche labeled the perp‑walk rumors 'gossip' and said Mr. Comey 'has been directed to appear' and is expected to do so, framing the reports as distractions.
- Patel said the media coverage was a 'detraction' from ongoing FBI work (cited Operation Midway Blitz) and stated 'We're not about theater...we're about producing our results in court.'
- FBI leadership discussed staging a public arrest ('perp walk') of James Comey rather than waiting for his voluntary court appearance.
- Plan details included assembling 'large, beefy' agents in Kevlar and exterior FBI‑marked gear to conduct the arrest.
- Supervisory special agent Chris Ray refused to participate, deeming it inappropriate for a white‑collar defendant, and was suspended for insubordination.
- Other FBI supervisors also refused to cooperate; FBI is reported to be actively working to assemble a team to carry out an arrest before Comey’s Oct. 9 arraignment.
- Compiles contemporaneous reactions from senior Democrats (Biden, Pelosi, Schumer, Kaine, Warner) characterizing the Comey indictment as political payback
- Attributes direct quotes from Schumer on NBC ('no faith in Trump’s judicial system') and from Trump defending the Comey indictment as 'about justice...not revenge'
- Frames the Comey indictment in contrast to Democratic praise of Trump's conviction as proof 'no one is above the law,' highlighting partisan divide
- Multiple House Democrats are actively reviewing personal finances (mortgages, tax returns) in response to the Comey indictment out of fear of politically motivated prosecutions.
- Some Democratic members have purchased or are exploring professional/ liability insurance to protect against potential legal actions.
- Direct quotes from members (Jared Huffman, Greg Landsman, Gil Cisneros, Joe Morelle) expressing fear that 'no one is safe' and describing specific defensive steps.
- Michael Cohen publicly told an MSNBC panel he believes James Comey "likely committed a crime" and said he "believe[s] likely he will be found guilty."
- The comments occurred during a live MSNBC panel with Elise Jordan, Ayman Mohyeldin and Molly Jong‑Fast, who visibly reacted to Cohen's assertion.
- Cohen framed his view by saying the government already has "hundreds of thousands of documents" and argued DOJ has been "weaponized," a line he used to contextualize his belief about the indictment's prospects.
- Sen. Amy Klobuchar publicly characterized the Trump administration as 'weaponizing the Justice Department' in reaction to the James Comey indictment.
- The remark was made on CBS's 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan' and ties public criticism to the recent forced resignation of prosecutor Eric Siebert.
+ 23 more sources