White House Memo: Repeal Could Trigger Nearly $192B in Healthcare Spending for Noncitizens, White House Says
A White House memo obtained by Republican outlets projects just over $192 billion in federal healthcare spending over the next decade for noncitizens if Democrats’ demand to repeal the healthcare title of the GOP “Working Families Tax Cut/One Big Beautiful Bill” is met, saying six provisions (including Medicaid and Medicare limits and emergency-care FMAP rules) would be undone. Independent reporting and analysts note that unauthorized immigrants are generally ineligible for Medicaid/Medicare and that CBO did not produce an analogous estimate for unauthorized‑immigrant measures; KFF cites about $131 billion in federal costs tied to proposals for immigrants with legal status, and state‑level claims (including GOP assertions about California provider‑tax schemes) have been disputed by state officials and outside experts.
📌 Key Facts
- A White House memo obtained by Fox News projects just over $192 billion (rounded in some reports to roughly $200 billion) in additional federal healthcare spending over the next decade if Democrats’ demand to repeal the healthcare title of President Trump’s “big, beautiful bill” (the Working Families Tax Cut Act) is met.
- The memo lists six specific provisions it says would be undone — including ending Medicaid funding limits for most non‑citizens, ending an enhanced FMAP for emergency care for unauthorized immigrants, ending Medicare funding for most non‑citizens, and closing a so‑called “California loophole” — and asserts Democrats demand repeal “as a condition of keeping the government open for four weeks.”
- House Republicans have circulated their own five‑page memo and framing that the Democratic continuing resolution would undo those reforms, would eliminate $50 billion in rural hospital funding included in the Republican package, and would loosen Medicaid financing related to non‑citizen care; Democrats dispute that characterization. The House passed the GOP CR on Sept. 19 and it remains stalled in the Senate.
- GOP officials have alleged California uses a Medicaid “provider tax” mechanism to draw federal matching dollars that are then pooled to pay for non‑emergency care for undocumented immigrants; California’s office denied this and health policy experts (including KFF commentators) say the claim misapplies provider‑tax and waiver rules.
- Reporting and analysis (Christian Science Monitor, KFF) note important legal limits: unauthorized immigrants are ineligible for Medicaid and Medicare and generally cannot buy ACA marketplace coverage, so some of the GOP framing overstates current federal eligibility; KFF’s analysis of CBO estimates found a $131 billion federal‑spending increase tied to proposals for immigrants with legal status, and there is no CBO estimate for extending coverage to unauthorized immigrants.
- Operational context: Emergency Medicaid — which reimburses hospitals for emergency care for unauthorized immigrants — comprises less than 1% of total Medicaid spending, and some states (for example California and Illinois) have used state funds to cover certain unauthorized immigrants, producing state‑level variation in impacts.
- The dispute is unfolding against an imminent federal funding deadline around Sept. 30. Competing continuing‑resolution proposals were reported: Republicans sought funding through Nov. 21, while Democrats proposed funding through Oct. 31 paired with extending enhanced ACA premium subsidies; analysts including KFF’s Cynthia Cox have warned of broader ripple effects if a short‑term deal is not reached.
📚 Contextual Background
- U.S. federal rules prohibit undocumented immigrants from receiving federal funds for health coverage through Medicare, Medicaid, and the Affordable Care Act's premium tax credits (as of 2025-10-05).
- Medicaid is a government health insurance program for people with low incomes or disabilities and is funded jointly by state and federal governments.
- Medicaid spending is typically one of the largest components of U.S. state budgets.
📊 Analysis & Commentary (1)
"An opinion piece arguing that migrants generally bring valuable human capital that is undervalued by headline fiscal estimates (like the White House memo’s $192B claim), and that policy should prioritize credential recognition and integration to capture long‑term economic gains rather than focus narrowly on short‑term costs."
đź“° Sources (5)
- House GOP released a five-page memo accusing Democrats’ continuing resolution of undoing the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (rebranded Working Families Tax Cuts) healthcare reforms.
- GOP memo claims Democrats’ approach would eliminate $50 billion in rural hospital funding included in the Republican package.
- Specifies competing CR durations: GOP through Nov. 21 versus Democrats through Oct. 31 paired with extending enhanced ACA subsidies.
- Notes GOP framing that repeal would loosen Medicaid financing related to non-citizen care; Democrats dispute the characterization.
- States the House passed the GOP CR on Sept. 19 and it remains stalled in the Senate.
- Explainer clarifies that unauthorized immigrants are ineligible for Medicaid/Medicare and cannot buy ACA coverage in most cases—contradicting sweepingly framed GOP claims.
- Article cites a White House memorandum claiming roughly $200 billion (similar to prior $192B figure) as the administration's spending estimate.
- Cites a KFF analysis of CBO estimates finding a $131 billion federal‑spending increase linked to Democrats’ proposals for immigrants with legal status; no CBO estimate for unauthorized‑immigrant measures was available.
- Provides operational detail that Emergency Medicaid—used to reimburse hospitals for emergency care to unauthorized immigrants—comprises less than 1% of total Medicaid spending.
- Notes some states (e.g., California and Illinois) have chosen to allow unauthorized immigrants to enroll in certain state‑funded programs, providing nuance on state‑level variation.
- Specific GOP claim that California is using a Medicaid 'provider tax' mechanism to draw federal matching dollars that are then pooled to pay for non‑emergency healthcare for undocumented immigrants.
- Quotes and sourcing: Steve Hilton (making the California allegation on the record), Michael Cannon (CATO) arguing provider taxes enable the draws, and Jennifer Tolbert (KFF) rebutting the claim as unrelated to provider‑tax uniformity waiver language.
- Newsom office denial to the L.A. Times: 'This is false — CA does not do this.'
- A White House memo obtained by Fox News Digital projects just over $192 billion in federal spending on healthcare for illegal immigrants over the next decade if Democrats' repeal demands are met.
- The memo explicitly ties the projected cost to repealing the healthcare title of President Trump's "big, beautiful bill," also called the Working Families Tax Cut Act.
- The memo lists six specific provisions that would be undone — including ending Medicaid funding limits for most non‑citizens, ending enhanced FMAP for emergency care for illegal immigrants, ending Medicare funding for most non‑citizens, and closing a so‑called 'California loophole' — and includes the phrase that Democrats demand repeal 'as a condition of keeping the government open for four weeks.'
- Issue: Whether Congress will renew 'enhanced' ACA premium tax credits that lower marketplace premiums
- Timing: The dispute is tied to an imminent federal funding lapse — described as happening 'next week' around the Sept. 30 appropriations deadline
- Source: CBS News interview/segment featuring Cynthia Cox of the Kaiser Family Foundation explaining potential ripple effects