Ninth Circuit grills Oregon in Trump Portland Guard case; panel signals skepticism
The Ninth Circuit on Thursday heard an appeal of U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut’s temporary restraining order that blocked the Trump administration from federalizing and deploying 200 Oregon National Guard troops to Portland, with an appellate order keeping the Guard under federal control but prohibiting deployment while the case proceeds. During roughly 90 minutes of argument before a three‑judge panel (two Trump appointees, one Clinton appointee), judges pressed Oregon’s lawyers—probing the “rebellion” standard, whether the state could rely on post‑authorization incidents, and whether its claims were “untethered from reality”—signaling skepticism even as the government argued Portland posed an active threat and local tensions, official maneuvers, and federal activity around the ICE facility continued.
📌 Key Facts
- The Ninth Circuit scheduled oral arguments for Thursday at noon ET on the government’s appeal of U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut’s temporary restraining order; arguments lasted roughly 90 minutes before a three‑judge panel (two Trump appointees, one Clinton appointee) and judges pressed Oregon’s lawyers with skepticism — including sharp questioning from Judge Ryan D. Nelson and probing from Judge Susan P. Graber about reliance on incidents that post‑dated the authorization.
- Judge Karin J. Immergut issued a TRO blocking the federalization/deployment of Oregon National Guard troops, finding the administration failed to show conditions justified federalizing the Guard; the order was tied to a Sept. 28 memorandum (signed by Pete Hegseth) calling 200 Oregon Guard members into federal service for 60 days.
- The Pentagon says Oregon National Guard members remain in Title 10 status but that “there are no Oregon National Guard members on mission in or around the Portland area”; an appellate order temporarily kept the troops under federal control while explicitly prohibiting their deployment to Portland, and troops have not yet been deployed.
- Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek directed U.S. Northern Command to demobilize and return 200 Oregon Guard members staged at Camp Rilea and directed the return of 200 California Guard members staged at Camp Withycombe, citing Judge Immergut’s expanded TRO and urging humane treatment of the soldiers.
- Reporting and video show federal agents in tactical gear (marked DHS and U.S. Border Patrol, with FPS/CBP/BOP present) detaining protesters and deploying tear gas near the Portland ICE facility — in one account occurring minutes after the judge’s restraining order — while DHS Secretary Kristi Noem visited the site, was filmed praying with officers, met with Gov. Kotek at the airport, and warned she could increase federal agents.
- The White House defended the president’s authority to protect federal assets and said it expects the Supreme Court to overturn the restraining order; DOJ lawyers argued Portland presents an “active threat” that satisfies the statutory 'rebellion' standard and the government’s asserted inability to execute the laws without Guard support.
- Local and state responses are mixed: some Portland business owners publicly supported a Guard presence and filed declarations in the lawsuit citing local crime concerns, Portland Mayor Keith Wilson reopened streets near the ICE building and offered to buy or take over the federal lease, 24 Democrat‑led states filed a brief supporting Oregon and California’s challenge, and Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell issued an executive order affirming police independence and creating a system to report alleged abuses by soldiers and federal agents.
- Context: troops from Oregon and California were assembled near Portland as part of the administration’s broader deployments (also involving efforts in Chicago), raising legal and policy questions about the Federal Protective Service’s statutory role versus the administration’s push to use the National Guard for protection of federal facilities.
📚 Contextual Background
- U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is the federal agency responsible for apprehending and detaining people suspected of being undocumented immigrants in the United States.
📰 Sources (11)
- Oral arguments lasted roughly 90 minutes before a three‑judge panel composed of two Trump appointees and one Clinton appointee.
- Judge Ryan D. Nelson sharply questioned Oregon AAG Stacy Chaffin, including a remark comparing Oregon’s standard to one that would constrain even President Lincoln.
- Oregon argued Trump’s portrayal of Portland unrest was “untethered from reality” and did not meet a statutory “rebellion” threshold.
- DOJ attorney Eric D. McArthur argued Portland presents an “active threat,” satisfying both ‘rebellion’ and the government’s inability to execute laws without the Guard.
- Judge Susan P. Graber probed whether the administration could rely on violent incidents that post‑dated the initial authorization.
- Twenty‑four Democrat‑led states signed a brief supporting California and Oregon’s challenge to deploying Guard troops in Portland.
- The 9th Circuit scheduled oral arguments for Thursday on the government’s bid to overcome the lower‑court block.
- Seattle Mayor Bruce Harrell signed an executive order affirming police independence and creating a system to report alleged abuses by soldiers and federal agents.
- Troops have not yet been deployed to Portland.
- The Ninth Circuit will hear arguments at noon ET on lifting the temporary ban on deploying Oregon National Guard troops in Portland.
- Background affirmed: Judge Karin Immergut found the administration failed to show conditions justified federalizing Oregon’s Guard.
- Portland Mayor Keith Wilson reopened streets near the ICE building after DHS Secretary Kristi Noem’s visit and offered to buy or take over the federal lease for the facility.
- President Trump called Portland demonstrators 'insurrectionists.'
- Federal appeals court temporarily granted the White House request to keep 200 Oregon National Guard troops under federal control while litigation proceeds.
- The same appellate order specifies Guard troops are still prohibited from deploying to Portland during the case.
- Sequence of weekend rulings: a Saturday TRO blocked federalization/deployment of Oregon Guard; a Sunday order also blocked deployment of out‑of‑state Guard to Oregon as the Pentagon eyed sending 200 California Guard.
- Local business owners filed declarations supporting Oregon’s lawsuit, citing harm from federal rhetoric and planned deployments.
- The Oregon case is set for a Thursday noon ET hearing while the administration appeals Judge Karin Immergut’s ruling to the Ninth Circuit.
- DHS Secretary Kristi Noem told Fox News she threatened to quadruple federal agents in Portland if local police did not provide more security, despite prior 'low energy' protest assessments.
- Troops from Oregon and California are assembled near Portland, but hearings will determine whether they can deploy.
- On‑the‑record interview with Chris Hayes, assistant director for field operations at the Federal Protective Service, describing daily confrontations and FPS’s role protecting the Portland ICE facility
- On‑the‑ground observations that FPS, Customs and Border Protection and Federal Bureau of Prisons personnel were present, agents stood on the roof, a conference room had blackened windows, and reporters observed two apparent detentions outside the gate
- Contextual reporting framing a policy question: the Monitor contrasts FPS’s statutory mission with the administration’s push to deploy National Guard troops and cites the temporary restraining order by Judge Karin Immergut blocking the Guard
- DHS Secretary Kristi Noem visited the Portland ICE facility and was filmed praying over officers while on the building roof.
- Noem met with Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek at the Portland airport prior to the site visit.
- Gov. Tina Kotek directed U.S. Northern Command to immediately demobilize Oregon’s 200 National Guard members staged at Camp Rilea and ordered the return of 200 California National Guard members staged at Camp Withycombe.
- Kotek cited Judge Karin J. Immergut’s expanded temporary restraining order as the legal basis for directing troops home and included an on‑record quote urging humane treatment of the Guard members.
- Named local business owners (Amy Nichols of a business with 10 break‑ins; Loretta Guzman of Bison Coffeehouse) publicly supporting federal/National Guard presence.
- Specific local anecdote: Guzman recounts her nephew being shot, an alleged 911 nonresponse during the incident, and that the nephew later died.
- Quote-level detail showing some Portland small‑business owners view National Guard presence as potentially beneficial to public safety and to bring attention to persistent crime.
- Identifies the blocking judge as U.S. District Judge Karin J. Immergut and provides nomination/confirmation details (Trump nominee, Senate voice‑vote confirmation 2019).
- Biographical background: Immmergut served as a line prosecutor for Independent Counsel Ken Starr and participated in debriefings and grand‑jury questioning of Monica Lewinsky.
- Quotes from her opinion: includes the phrase 'The President’s determination was simply untethered to the facts.'
- Connects the TRO to the defendants’ September 28, 2025 memorandum (signed by Pete Hegseth) calling 200 Oregon National Guard members into federal service for 60 days.
- Video footage shows federal agents in tactical gear (marked DHS and U.S. Border Patrol) detaining protesters and deploying tear gas late Sunday, described as occurring minutes after Judge Karin Immergut's restraining order.
- Pentagon told Fox News Digital that while Oregon National Guard members remain under T10 status, 'there are no Oregon National Guard members on mission in or around the Portland area.'
- White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson issued a statement defending the president's authority to protect federal assets and saying the administration expects the Supreme Court to overturn the restraining order.