NY AG Letitia James indicted for bank fraud, false statements tied to Norfolk mortgage
A federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia on Oct. 9, 2025 indicted New York Attorney General Letitia James on two counts—bank fraud and making false statements—alleging she misrepresented a 2020 $109,600 mortgage on a Norfolk, Va., home as a second residence while renting it, saving roughly $19,000 in loan costs. The indictment, presented by U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan amid turmoil in EDVA after the ouster of former U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert and following a separate EDVA indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, drew sharp partisan reactions, denials from James and her attorney calling it political retribution, questions from legal experts about the case’s strength, and an initial Norfolk court appearance set for Oct. 24; penalties cited include up to 30 years and $1 million fines per count.
📌 Key Facts
- On Oct. 9, 2025 a federal grand jury in the Eastern District of Virginia returned a five‑page indictment charging New York Attorney General Letitia James with two counts: bank fraud and making false statements to a financial institution.
- Prosecutors allege James misrepresented a Norfolk, Va., property as a 'second residence' to obtain a $109,600 mortgage in 2020 (while renting it to a family), securing more favorable terms and an estimated nearly $19,000 lifetime savings.
- U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan personally presented the James case to the grand jury (after a venue shift to Alexandria), and also led the recent Comey prosecution; James’ initial federal appearance is scheduled for Oct. 24, 2025 before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller in Norfolk.
- Federal officials say each count carries up to 30 years in prison, up to a $1 million fine per count and potential forfeiture; Halligan said 'No one is above the law,' and the DOJ issued a statement about being 'united' in its mission.
- There is reported internal DOJ controversy: career prosecutors and former EDVA U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert reportedly concluded earlier the evidence was insufficient before Siebert’s ouster, and the timing of the James indictment follows the Comey indictment and raised concerns about politicization amid public calls from former President Trump.
- James and her lawyer Abbe David Lowell have denied wrongdoing and called the case political retribution/weaponization; the indictment has prompted partisan responses—New York officials and Democrats condemned the prosecution as politically motivated while several Republicans praised it.
- Context and potential next steps: James previously won (and later saw reversed) a $367 million civil fraud judgment against Trump and faced subpoenas to her office this year; people familiar with the matter say Halligan may seek additional charges against James.
📰 Sources (12)
- Halligan presented the James case to an Alexandria, Va., grand jury after initially planning to take it to Norfolk; the venue shift was due to logistics and timing.
- Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche were not informed of the precise timing; Halligan moved ahead without advance notice to them.
- People familiar with her plans say Halligan is likely to bring additional charges against James.
- Halligan presented both the James and Comey cases largely by herself, with limited help from DOJ leadership and little to none from career attorneys in her office.
- DOJ spokesman Chad Gilmartin issued a statement that the department is “united as one team in our mission to make America safe again.”
- Context on Halligan’s rapid timeline: indicted Comey days after her Sept. 22 appointment and then quickly secured the James indictment.
- NYC Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani publicly defended AG Letitia James at a Friday press conference, calling the indictment 'a shameless act of political retribution' by the Trump administration.
- Mamdani said he spoke with James after the indictment and quoted her as saying, 'Don't worry about me,' asserting she is confident in her legal team and in winning the case.
- The event was framed as New York leaders 'speaking with one voice' in defense of James following the Virginia grand jury charges.
- Initial appearance will be before Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller in Norfolk on Oct. 24.
- U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan said 'No one is above the law' and reiterated potential penalties (up to 30 years and $1 million fine per count).
- Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer called the indictment 'tyranny' and accused the DOJ of being used as a 'personal attack dog.'
- Rep. Elise Stefanik highlighted James' February 2024 post about not lying to banks, calling out 'hypocrisy.'
- James has publicly said she made an error on a form and corrected it, denying intent to deceive the lender.
- Attorney General Pam Bondi scheduled a DOJ news briefing at 11:30 a.m. ET on Oct. 10.
- Lindsey Halligan personally presented the James case to the grand jury (per AP sourcing).
- Letitia James’ initial appearance is scheduled in Norfolk federal court on Oct. 24, 2025.
- Extended quotes from James and from her attorney Abbe Lowell disputing the charges and alleging political retribution.
- Context that the James indictment comes two weeks after the Comey indictment and followed Siebert’s ouster, with Halligan also presenting the Comey case.
- Loan specifics: indictment centers on a $109,600 mortgage obtained in 2020 for a Norfolk, Va., home.
- Prosecutors allege James secured more favorable terms and stood to save nearly $19,000 over the life of the loan.
- Indictment length noted as five pages; alleges misrepresentation of 'second residence' intent while renting the property.
- New on-the-record statement from U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan calling the acts 'tremendous breaches of the public’s trust.'
- Legal experts (Gene Rossi, Jacqueline Kelly, Rizwan Qureshi) question viability based on small dollar figure and intent-to-defraud hurdles.
- Internal DOJ context: people familiar say career prosecutors and former EDVA U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert believed evidence was insufficient before Siebert’s ouster; Halligan presented the case.
- NPR emphasizes the EDVA grand jury handled the case, noting parallels to James Comey’s recent EDVA indictment.
- Reports that the top EDVA prosecutor was pushed out after earlier internal findings said evidence was too weak to charge, with indictments following Trump’s public calls, raising concerns about politicization.
- James asserts she is being targeted for doing her job as New York attorney general.
- EDVA U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan stated on the record that the charges carry up to 30 years in prison per count, up to a $1 million fine on each count, and potential forfeiture.
- Halligan’s quote: “No one is above the law… intentional, criminal acts and tremendous breaches of the public’s trust.”
- Letitia James’ response labeling the case “political retribution” was reiterated with a new on‑the‑record statement.
- New partisan reaction roundup: support from Republicans Elise Stefanik and Marjorie Taylor Greene; denunciations from Democrats Ritchie Torres, Jerry Nadler, and Gov. Kathy Hochul; NYC mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani called James a “champion for justice.”
- Identifies the exact charges: one count of bank fraud and one count of making false statements to a financial institution.
- Details the alleged scheme: misrepresenting a Norfolk, Va. home as a second residence to obtain a favorable mortgage, while renting it to a family of three.
- Publishes the full indictment document (via CBS/Scribd).
- Includes a detailed denial from James’ attorney Abbe David Lowell, who alleges political retaliation.
- PBS/AP published the full EDVA indictment document for public review.
- Includes Letitia James’ on‑the‑record statement calling the case 'weaponization' and denying wrongdoing.
- Article reiterates the charges (bank fraud and false statements) and notes the mortgage‑fraud probe context.
- Axios report specifies the indictment contains two charges.
- Confirms the action was taken by a federal grand jury tied to EDVA on Oct. 9, 2025.
- Axios ties the indictment’s timing to turmoil in the Eastern District of Virginia, noting U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert left under pressure from President Trump after not bringing charges against James and Comey.
- Adds context that Comey was indicted last month after Siebert’s resignation.
- Notes James previously won a $367 million civil fraud judgment against Trump that was later reversed, and that Trump issued subpoenas to her office this year.